Lost Songs: “Warthog Rhapsody” from THE LION KING

THE LION KING

Before there was “Hakuna Matata”, there was “Warthog Rhapsody”. Thankfully, the song was replaced by the time The Lion King was released. The version in the clip below comes from a commercial spin-off album of music inspired by the film, Rhythm Of The Pride Lands.

There are several reasons why “Hakuna Matata” is a better song than “Warthog Rhapsody”. Let’s take a look at some of them.

“Warthog Rhapsody” is, simply put, second rate, both musically and lyrically. Musically, the number lacks the energy and momentum required by the song that would need to fill that particular spot in film at that point. Even worse, the song sounds like it was churned out by some kind of keyboard programme – formulaic and predictable – and the music overpowers the lyrics, which do not sit well on the melody at all. Not that it matters, because the lyrics sound like Tim Rice trying to force words into a programmed melody. The lyrics are not married well to the music at all. There are missed accents all over the place and some of the vocabulary used is so clearly inappropriate to these characters. The lyrics simply don’t sing, nor do they compel one to listen to what’s being said. They’re completely flaccid, incapable of moving the narrative along in the way they should.

THE LION KING

Nick Cordileone as Timon and Ben Lipitz as Pumbaa in the national tour of THE LION KING. Photo Credit: Joan Marcus.

This brings us to the second, more pressing difference between the numbers: “Warthog Rhapsody” focuses squarely on Pumba. One of the key differences between this song and “Hakuna Matata” is that the latter takes forward Simba’s story, which is really what matters here. After all, this is The Lion King, not “The Neverending Saga of Timon and Pumba.”

(Some people object to the fact that “Hakuna Matata” as heard in the final cut of the film doesn’t include the verse about Timon, which was eventually heard in The Lion King 1½. Again, the answer is simple: one does not need to find out about what happened to Timon for “Hakuna Matata” to function as a narrative building block of the film. The basic requirement of the song is that it needs to take the story forward. The version used in the film achieves this and would strain under the weight of an extra verse. Anyway, it is incorrect to say that “Hakuna Matata” focuses solely on Pumba. The song focuses primarily on Simba’s journey and the development of the character: Pumba’s story is merely a means to that end and Timon’s verse would simply be padding out a point that had already been made. The key thing in this song was to figure out how it related to Simba’s journey. What was included in “Hakuna Matata” was enough to do that and enough to take the story forward.)

It’s easy to see why “Hakuna Matata” is a better song for The Lion King than “Warthog Rhapsody” and why the song didn’t find a place in the stage show when it premiered in 1997. The stage show is padded with enough sub-par Elton John and Tim Rice songs as it as, none of which serves the show well at all. Like “Warthog Rhapsody”, they are neither as good as the other additions to the stage score nor are they on par with any of the songs originally heard in the film.

Posted in Features | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Review Roundup: BLOOD BROTHERS in South Africa

bbposterDavid Kramer’s adaptation of Willy Russell’s Blood Brothers has opened in Cape Town, South Africa, and the reviews are in! Blood Brothers tells the tale of Mrs Johnstone, an impoverished woman who gives one of her twins to a wealthier woman, Mrs Lyons, in the hope that he will have a better life. Although the brothers are never supposed to know of each other’s existance, fate brings them together, eventually leading to a tragic outcome.

Tickets for the show, which will run at Theatre on the Bay in Cape Town, Montecasino in Johannesburg and the Fugard Theatre in Cape Town, are available through Computicket.

masksyes

Die Burger

“David Kramer het ’n goed ontwikkelde sin vir trefferpotensiaal. Sy jongste inisiatief, naamlik om die Brit Willy Russell se gewilde musiekblyspel Blood Brothers te verplaas van Liverpool in Engeland na ’n Kaapse konteks, spruit juis daaruit. En, as die openingsaand van Blood Brothers enigsins ’n aanduiding is, is hy wéér in die kol.”

Read the full review here.

Cape Argus

“A feat of note. Apart from the brilliance of Kramer’s adaptation, this production is memorable for the quality of its staging. The result is a show to engage its audience from the first bar of the overture to the final tableau.”

This review is not available online.

The Cape Times

“It’s refreshing to encounter a specifically adapted Cape Town story from the 1960’s and 1970’s which doesn’t deal blatantly with race. Examining the tensions between classes and familial bonds makes it a tale everyone can relate to.”

This review is not available online.

Sunday Independent

“Leaving the theatre, one is left feeling nothing but the utmost respect for David Kramer. A heart-rending and intensely unforgettable experience. An accomplished production by an ardent and compassionate creative team, Blood Brothers will appeal to anyone interested in heartfelt and substantial storytelling.”

This review is not available online.

masksno

BroadwayWorld

“The announcement that David Kramer would be adapting Willy Russell’s BLOOD BROTHERS was an exciting one…. Months later, the show is on stage at Theatre on the Bay, and the reality of what has been achieved in this adaptation belies the potential that this version of BLOOD BROTHERS held in its conception. While there are some moments that work beautifully, there are many where the shaky ideological foundation upon which this production is built calls the entire exercise into question.”

Read the full review here.

Posted in Features, Review Roundup | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Musical Cyberspace: This Week’s Cover

MC Cover 10072013

Posted in Covers | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Saturday List: 5 Cookin’ Musicals of the 1950s

What’s buzzin, cuzzins? This is a list of 5 of my favourite musicals of the 1950s, with slang courtesy of Fifties Web. Click on the title of each musical to view other blogs on Musical Cyberspace about each show.

5. My Fair Lady

Some people will tell you that My Fair Lady is perfect. I hate to be the party pooper, but it isn’t. It’s almost perfect and is certainly excellent for the most part, but in the opening number Higgins says that people who use English badly should be hung. And with that one lyric, Alan Jay Lerner contradicts every given circumstance of the character. In, say, Paint Your Wagon the mistake might not matter, given the character in whose mouth the words might be put. But here it matters in spades. It’s not the only linguistic error given to Higgins either, but I suppose we should just remember that Lerner was the Tim Rice of his day and be done with it. (Take a look at “On the Street Where You Live”, where a number of different lyric-writing sins can be found, if you have any doubts.) After all, there is a great deal to appreciate in the show: one of the most joyous overtures ever created, a book that is literary in its quality (thanks to the source material, natch) and many great songs (“I’ve Grown Accustomed to Her Face”, “Wouldn’t It Be Loverly?”, “Show Me”, and the list goes on.) It’s a classic, and it deserves to be. But it’s not perfect.

4. Guys and Dolls

Guys and Dolls. One of the most popular musicals of all time; people go ape for it. Even I’ve been involved in two productions: in high school I played the drunk and the Hot Box MC and danced in “Havana” and “The Crap Shooter’s Ballet” and a few years ago I choreographed a high school production of the show. In the decade between, I’ve seen countless productions announced and produced. Generally, there’s a perception that it’s flop-proof, but I guess the most recent Broadway revival proved that theory wrong. People are ambivalent about the film and, while it’s not perfect, there’s much to enjoy: Brando as Sky, the stunning scene between Sarah and Sky in the mission, Michael Kidd’s choreography and so on. The show itself has a super book by Abe Burrows and the score is – in a word – fantastic. Every number is memorable. For a special treat, get yourself a copy of the African-American 1976 Broadway Revival’s. It’s super, and the numbers are reborn in their new disco and gospel influences arrangements. Of course this is a supplement to either the original Broadway cast recording or the excellent 1995 studio recording of the complete score – one that perhaps sets the standard for all Guys and Dolls recordings.

Posted in The Saturday List | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Angela Lansbury: an Anna for the Ages?

Angela Lansbury

Angela Lansbury in THE KING AND I

Angela Lansbury in THE KING AND I

I’ve often thought about how much I would have loved to see Angela Lansbury in The King and I when she performed in the show opposite Michael Kermoyan on Broadway in 1978. Regular readers of this blog might know that, as far as I’m concerned, Lansbury is the ultimate musical theatre actress: the best Rose Hovick, an unmatchable Mame Dennis, a top class Nellie Lovett and a delightfully despicable Cora Hoover Hooper. She has also played Madame Armfeldt in A Little Night Music, Countess Aurelia in Dear World and the title role in the gigantic Boston flop, Prettybelle. In between all of that she squeezed in just three weeks of performances in The King and I as Anna Leonowens, a role created in 1951 by Gertrude Lawrence and immortalised on film by Deborah Kerr, with more than a little help from Marni Nixon.

The revival opened in 1977 with Yul Brynner and Constance Towers, and Lansbury was brought in for 24 performances while Brynner was out on holiday. Everything I’ve read about her in the role has led me to believe that she was excellent, as have conversations I have had with people who saw her during her brief stint as Anna. Some people rate Lansbury’s version of “Getting to Know You” as their favourite; her “Can I Tell You What I Think Of You?” was reportedly pretty fierce; her dynamic with Kermoyan incredibly effective, with the moment where he takes her waist in “Shall We Dance?” brimming with sexual tension; and her performance in the King’s death scene completely moving.

How I wish there was at least an official cast recording with Lansbury in the role! I say official as, of course, there are bootleg recordings of Lansbury’s Anna. These reveal some fascinating insights into her interpretation of the role.

Angela Lansbury and the children in THE KING AND I

Angela Lansbury and the children in THE KING AND I. Photo credit: Jack Mitchell.

Her take on “I Whistle a Happy Tune”, for instance, radiates sheer joy, the attitude of a woman who, in spite of the trepidation she feels starting out on this huge adventure, feels she has made the right choice, secure in the fact that the King will live up to every aspect of their agreement, which is a very comfortable one. It also shows just how the brave the face she is putting on for her son, Louis. Simply through playing into the emotional quality of the music, Lansbury has given Anna many layers and sets up the motivation for the anger and disappointment she feels in the next scene where the King reneges on his agreement to give her a house of her own. Most Annas play the song as a piece that sets up the whistling punch line to the scene, when Anna is confronted by the convey sent to take her to the palace, thus showing the whistle as an idea that quells her own fears as well as her son’s – which is fine and is supported by the text. Nonetheless, Lansbury’s approach increases the stakes and the complexity of what Anna is experiencing.

Lansbury biographers, Rob Edelman and Audrey Kupferberg, reported in Angela Lansbury: A Life on Stage and Screen that Lansbury felt that playing Anna was ‘the chance of a lifetime for me.’ The role fitted her like a glove and Lansbury used her special talents to restore the narrative balance of The King and I, which had become more about the King than Anna (who is, after all, the protagonist of the tale) owing to Yul Brynner’s electric performance and the way that the connection between him and the role was, at that time, a huge selling point of the show.

For her short spell as Anna, Lansbury was nominated for the 1978 Drama Desk Award for Outstanding Actress in a Musical. I am certain her performance was nothing less than magical.

Posted in Features | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Life of a Song: “Love Changes Everything”

ASPECTS OF LOVE LOGO“Love Changes Everything” is the most famous song from Andrew Lloyd Webber, Don Black and Charles Hart’s 1989 musical, Aspects of Love. Based on Aspects of Love by David Garnett, the show focuses on the romantic and sexual entanglements of a quintet of characters, at the centre of which are actress Rose Vibert and her young admirer, Alex Dillingham.

The song peaked at #2 on the UK singles charts, on which it was featured for 3½ months – no mean feat for a show tune at that point in time. Much of this can probably be attributed to the anthemic feel of the song and its three chord structure. Originally written in G major (around the chords G, C and D), before modulating up to A flat major, Andrew Lloyd Webber transposed the entire song up a key (A major, modulating up to B flat major) to showcase the crystal clear tenor voice of Michael Ball, who introduced the song to the musical theatre canon.

Ball’s stamp on the song is definitive and most male singers who tackle the song – from Michael Crawford to John Barrowman – follow the template laid by this actor-singer, who originated the role of Alex in the stage show. Before we take a look at some of the different cover versions of the song, let’s take a look at the single that was released by the Really Useful Company to promote the show in its original production.

Next: The Tony Awards and Sarah Brightman

Posted in Features | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Musical Cyberspace: This Week’s Cover

MC Cover 09302013

Posted in Covers | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Musical Theatre Sunday School: LIZA MINNELLI – BORN A STAR Readathon Part 1

This month in Musical Theatre Sunday School, we will have a readathon of Wendy Leigh’s Liza Minnelli biography, Born a Star. Although the book is out of print, you can pick up a fairly cheap copy from Amazon if you are keen to follow along. In the column, I’ll be discussing the sections of the book that deal with Minnelli’s involvement in musicals and – as always – I’d love to hear your thoughts, so head to the comment box below!

Liza Minnellia in BEST FOOT FORWARD

Liza Minnelli in BEST FOOT FORWARD

We all know that Minnelli made her debut in a musical in the movie, In the Good Old Summertime, as Veronica and Andrew’s daughter. Veronica was played by Minnelli’s own mother, Judy Garland. Minnelli’s father, Vincente, was an esteemed film director and the thesis of Leigh’s book is that Liza, having been born a star, could never have led a normal existence. Leigh makes a strong case for her argument in her depiction of Minnelli’s childhood, being shuttled between her mother and father’s respective households, never letting on how much she had to care for her mother in Garland’s darkest periods. While the book is not brilliantly written, with the imagery in Leigh’s prose jumping about all over the place, seemingly contradictory at times, one gets the idea as the book covers the first 16 years of Liza’s life in six quick chapters.

With that noted and this being a musical-themed site, let’s jump ahead to Minnelli’s first big musical, Best Foot Forward in Chapter Seven of the book. (She had appeared in summer stock productions of Wish You Were Here, Take Me Along and Flower Drum Song following her time at the High School of Performing Arts. See Chapter Five.) Best Foot Forward was written in 1941 by Hugh Martin and Ralph Blane, with book by John Cecil Holm and this revival of the high school comedy was mounted Off-Broadway in 1963.

Minnelli auditioned for the role and Arthur Whitelaw, who was producing the show, said that she was the only child from six show business families that auditioned for them that had any talent. I wonder what it must have been like to see Minnelli’s audition at that time. She is described in the book as having been very nervous, physically shaking and appearing quite vulnerable. By all accounts, she also worked very hard during that first period of her life, but it seems to me that Minnelli has always worked hard – even when she was partying just as hard in the 1970s. (Of course, then the partying took the toll on her ability to work hard, but I think the intention to work hard was always there. Just look at how even now Minnelli puts everything into what she does.) During rehearsals for Best Foot Forward, Minnelli fractured one of her feet and soldiered on until the rehearsal was over before going to hospital to have it examined.

BEST FOOT FORWARD

To purchase the Off-Broadway Cast Recording of BEST FOOT FORWARD with Liza Minnelli, click on the image above.

A moving story related to this time period in Minnelli’s life is the story of the opening night, which Garland did not attend. The line given was that Garland had done so purposefully so as not to overshadow Minnelli’s New York stage debut. But Leigh reports an overheard phone conversation in which it appears that Garland either forgot or that something more sinister – although not life threatening – had prevented her from coming. It seems to me, perhaps, that the lack of normality in Minnelli’s life had less to do with being “born a star” than it had to do with dealing with a parent who faced very real problems with addition.

The reviews for Minnelli were great, comparing the ‘haunting overtones’ of her voice to her mother’s (Richard Watts in the New York Post) and noting her appeal and sense of comedy. Minnelli was paid $45 a week for her work on the show.

This chapter closes off with an incident related to Minnelli’s subsequent appearance in the musical, Carnival. Minnelli had suffered a kidney stone attack and Garland tried to prevent her appearance in Carnival, claiming that she was worried about her daughter’s health. While it appears that Minnelli was highly anxious due to Garland’s interference in her career, she did the show anyway – a clear signal to her mother that she was on her own journey now.

That seems like a good place to end for today. More on Minnelli next week, folks. See you then! Happy reading!

Posted in Musical Theatre Sunday School | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Monday Montage: MATILDA: THE MUSICAL

MATILDA

To purchase the original London Cast Recording of MATILDA, click on the image above.

The Monday Montage for today focuses on Matilda, the big UK import of the 2012-2013 Broadway season. The Broadway opening of the show took place on on 11 April 2013 at the Schubert Theatre. The book of this musical, based on the children’s novel by Roald Dahl, was written by Dennis Kelly, with music and lyrics by Tim Minchin.

To view the Matilda Monday Montage, simply follow this link to view photos, videos and merchandising from the show on Pinterest. Have fun!

Posted in Monday Montage | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Monday Montage: KINKY BOOTS

KINKY BOOTS

To purchase the original Broadway Cast Recording of KINKY BOOTS, click on the image above.

Our second Monday Montage for the month of May takes a look at Kinky Boots, the new musical based on the low-key, but loads of fun film of the same name. Conceived as far back as 2008, the production premiered in Chicago in 2012 and came to Broadway this year, opening on 4 April at the Al Hirschfeld Theatre. Kinky Boots features a book written by Harvey Fierstein and a score by Cyndi Lauper.

To view the Kinky Boots Monday Montage, simply follow this link to view photos, videos and merchandising from the show on Pinterest. Have a fabulous time!

Posted in Monday Montage | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment