Following my 2010 redux blog on “Genres of Musical Theatre“, I received a message from Hans Anders Elgvang, a regular visitor of this site, asking: ‘What are, in your opinion, the differences between the form categories musical comedy and musical play?’ This is my response.
The basic intention behind musical comedy is entertainment (Anything Goes, Crazy For You), while that of a musical play is enlightenment (South Pacific, West Side Story).
In terms of the book, musical comedies tend to present situations that are broader in their construction (Girl Crazy, Babes in Arms), while musical plays tend to be more subtle and detailed in their construction (The King and I, My Fair Lady). This applies to narrative as well as character (compare Annie and Frank in Annie Get Your Gun with Julie and Billy in Carousel). In musical comedies, improbabilities are overlooked (Nina changes her whole system of beliefs based on a piece of clothing in Silk Stockings), while in musical plays they are inexcusable (it is not a piece of clothing that shifts Mother’s ideology in Ragtime). Comedy in musical comedies is maximal, but musical plays use comedy within the limits of character: compare the one-liners given to Kate in Girl Crazy with the portrayal of Ado Annie in Oklahoma!
Although by no means a hard and fast rule today as it was in the past, musical comedies tend to be feature more contemporary settings (Anything Goes, Silk Stockings), while musical plays tend more frequently to be set in the past (Carousel, Oklahoma!): this characteristic of the difference between the two forms was particularly clear during the “golden age” of musical theatre and the delineation has been broken down dramatically in the past 40 years. Even so, when the past is depicted in musical comedy, it is often through the lens of contemporary sensibilities.
In terms of music and lyrics, the dramatic integration of numbers in musical comedies becomes flimsier the further one retreats into musical theatre history, with musical comedies from the mid-1940s onwards reflecting to some extent the sense of integration demanded by the musical play, where the dramatic integration of the numbers is always first and foremost. Musical comedies tend to have lighter content than musical plays, which tend towards more emotional content. A number in a musical comedy may move around from show to show, but this method of integrating material into musical plays is debatable depending on the example.
In terms of dance, musical comedy gives us “hoofing” (Anything Goes), while musical plays give us “choreography” (West Side Story). The difference is that the former involves a language devised for pure entertainment, while the latter involves a language that extends the action of the musical on a larger scale.
When modern versions of the musical comedy surface, making it difficult to distinguish between the two because of how musical comedy has had to change in reaction to the appearance of the musical play, one should return to the fundamental principle that separates the two: a musical comedy primarily entertains and a musical play primarily enlightens.
This is very interesting to read. Where do you have it from? Are these your own thoughts, or are there sources on this?
This is all just what’s settled in my head after finishing my Masters. As such, I’m not sure if there is any one definitive source and it’s most likely composited from all the reading I did, which was pretty much anything about musical theatre I could get my hands on, from Scott Miller and Ethan Mordden to John Clum and Stephen Citron.