
BEAUTY AND THE BEAST
Every now and again one comes across a “crazy concept” that is used to bring new life into a classic show. Such concepts are not necessarily ‘crazy’; they are merely unconventional. I stumbled across this one on Musicals Dot Net, posted by a user known as “broadwayfreak67”:
My school is doing Beauty and the Beast this coming school year, and I have an idea of how to put Cogsworth, Lumiere, and all of the other characters that were from the castle (not the Beast) into “Belle”: have Lumiere, for example, with a candle (the old looking ones with the handles) and the duster with a broom or something.
In other words, it would make use of the technique used by The Wizard of Oz whereby, for example, the actors playing the three farmhands double as the Scarecrow, Tin Man and Cowardly Lion. The difference between the two shows is that the double casting in The Wizard of Oz has some resonance beyond coincidence – there is a strong connection between the characters in Kansas and Oz – while, in Beauty and the Beast, one would have to skirt around this pitfall of making Belle’s experiences in the castle appear to be a dream or an alternate world conceptually based on her life in the village, an idea that could confuse the audience if it was too prominent a part of the action. As such, I think it would be essential that it is clear that the village characters are neither the enchanted objects nor their human counterparts.
The other thing that occurs to me is that, in the high school context mentioned in the quote above – or in any other production where one might be trying to include larger numbers in the cast for whatever reason), six spots on stage that should belong to the chorus would be taken up by people who already have lead roles.









BEAUTY AND THE BEAST: a “Change” for Better or Worse?
BEAUTY AND THE BEAST
One of the most common discussions around the score of Beauty and the Beast focuses on “A Change in Me”, the song that was added to the score in 1998 for Toni Braxton when she played the role of Belle. Here’s my take on the song.
In context, it’s all right – not great, but it works for the moment. The melody is lovely and lilting and the song flows out of the action of the book far better than some of the other songs created for the stage show, but the lyrics are too general. There’s nothing particularly character or situation specific in the song: countless characters in the musical theatre or Disney canons could sing about how they ‘never thought (they’d) leave behind (their) childhood dreams’. Other lyrics just don’t add up: ‘dark despair’ is pompous in tone and more suited to the Beast than to Belle, and when Belle sings ‘my perfect world out there had disappeared for good’, this is just incongruent with the narrative, because her world was obviously imperfect to begin with, hence her dissatisfaction with her ‘provincial life’ at the top of the show.
Out of context, when placed in the jukebox show On the Record, the song is simply disappointing. The barer arrangement exposes the weakness of the lyrics and by the end Ashley Brown has belted any charm the song had into oblivion.