Crazy Concepts for Classic Shows: BEAUTY AND THE BEAST

Beauty and the Beast Cover

BEAUTY AND THE BEAST

Every now and again one comes across a “crazy concept” that is used to bring new life into a classic show. Such concepts are not necessarily ‘crazy’; they are merely unconventional. I stumbled across this one on Musicals Dot Net, posted by a user known as “broadwayfreak67”:

My school is doing Beauty and the Beast this coming school year, and I have an idea of how to put Cogsworth, Lumiere, and all of the other characters that were from the castle (not the Beast) into “Belle”: have Lumiere, for example, with a candle (the old looking ones with the handles) and the duster with a broom or something.

In other words, it would make use of the technique used by The Wizard of Oz whereby, for example, the actors playing the three farmhands double as the Scarecrow, Tin Man and Cowardly Lion. The difference between the two shows is that the double casting in The Wizard of Oz has some resonance beyond coincidence – there is a strong connection between the characters in Kansas and Oz – while, in Beauty and the Beast, one would have to skirt around this pitfall of making Belle’s experiences in the castle appear to be a dream or an alternate world conceptually based on her life in the village, an idea that could confuse the audience if it was too prominent a part of the action. As such, I think it would be essential that it is clear that the village characters are neither the enchanted objects nor their human counterparts.

The other thing that occurs to me is that, in the high school context mentioned in the quote above – or in any other production where one might be trying to include larger numbers in the cast for whatever reason), six spots on stage that should belong to the chorus would be taken up by people who already have lead roles.

Posted in Crazy Concepts, Musicals, Theatremaking | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

BEAUTY AND THE BEAST: a “Change” for Better or Worse?

Beauty and the Beast Cover

BEAUTY AND THE BEAST

One of the most common discussions around the score of Beauty and the Beast focuses on “A Change in Me”, the song that was added to the score in 1998 for Toni Braxton when she played the role of Belle. Here’s my take on the song.

In context, it’s all right – not great, but it works for the moment. The melody is lovely and lilting and the song flows out of the action of the book far better than some of the other songs created for the stage show, but the lyrics are too general. There’s nothing particularly character or situation specific in the song: countless characters in the musical theatre or Disney canons could sing about how they ‘never thought (they’d) leave behind (their) childhood dreams’. Other lyrics just don’t add up: ‘dark despair’ is pompous in tone and more suited to the Beast than to Belle, and when Belle sings ‘my perfect world out there had disappeared for good’, this is just incongruent with the narrative, because her world was obviously imperfect to begin with, hence her dissatisfaction with her ‘provincial life’ at the top of the show.

Out of context, when placed in the jukebox show On the Record, the song is simply disappointing. The barer arrangement exposes the weakness of the lyrics and by the end Ashley Brown has belted any charm the song had into oblivion.

Posted in Broadway, Commentary, Disney, Musicals | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

EVERY LITTLE STEP Interviews

EVERY LITTLE STEP Poster

Playbill has run a great article about this documentary, with some general information and interviews with the filmmakers, Charlotte d’Amboise, Jason Tam and Kay Cole. A couple of choice quotations from d’Amboise and Tam :

Charlotte d’Amboise:Playing Cassie is the hardest thing I’ve done. You have to dance like it’s the last time you’re ever going to dance…. I never ever felt happy with my performance. Well, maybe six times I danced great, sang great, acted great. Usually, one part was missing. Cassie’s fantastic, but it’s not fun. It’s gut-wrenching, and hard in a long run. It wore on me, in a way that surprised me.

Jason Tam: First of all, I wanted to get ‘off book’ completely. It’s hard to find the truth of emotional life and circumstance if I’m tied to what I have to say next. I didn’t want Paul to be a sob story. Paul hasn’t felt sorry for himself for a second. If he did, he wouldn’t be who he is. He disappoints his parents. Even though his father says, ‘Take care of my son,’ in his heart, Paul hears his mother say, ‘Oh, my God!’ In truth, I think it’s his own voice, as well. He has a sort of love-hate relationship with being a dancer and his sexuality. Then I tried to focus on telling the story and getting the job. That’s what he’s there for. The emotional stuff is boiling underneath, whether or not he likes it.

Every Little Step looks like a great piece of work, a testament to one of the greatest musicals ever created. I can’t wait to see it!

Posted in Movies, Musicals | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Newsflash: ET -an Extra-Terrestrial Musical?

Pictured left to right: Steven Spielberg, ET and Julie Andrews

Following the success of Shrek, Dreamworks Theatricals has announced a musical adaptation of the classic Steven Spielberg film ET: the Extra-Terrestrial. Speaking on behalf of Dreamworks, Spielberg said:

Looking back at the films we’ve made over the years, ET seems a natural choice. It reached such a wide audience back then and we hope to introduce the property to new audiences in a new way today. A workshop is being planned for fall 2009, with Shrek team Jeanine Tesori and David Lindsay-Abaire providing music and lyrics….

As for the cast, there have been no announcements, but Spielberg said that a genuine Broadway star was being sought to bring ET to life.

“We’d see a puppet on stage, but we’ve been talking with Julie Andrews about providing us with a voice for this iconic character. The character lends itself to a limited vocal range and Julie loves the film – so we think it’d be a match made up there in the stars.”

Thoughts, anyone?

Posted in Musicals, Newsflash | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments

“Top 10 Musicals: 2000 – 2009” Poll Results

These are the results of a poll that was held earlier this year. I’ve decided to list the Top 20 based on everybody’s Top 10 votes.

THE FINAL TALLY:

  1. Avenue Q (4)
  2. The Light in the Piazza (4)
  3. Grey Gardens (4)
  4. The Last Five Years (4)
  5. Urinetown (4)
  6. Wicked (4)
  7. The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee (4)
  8. In the Heights (6)
  9. Hairspray (5)
  10. Spring Awakening (5)
  11. Dirty Rotten Scoundrels (5)
  12. The Wild Party (Lippa) (5)
  13. The Drowsy Chaperone (5)
  14. The Producers (5)
  15. [title of show] (5)
  16. Spamalot (5)
  17. The Wild Party (LaChiusa) (3)
  18. Thoroughly Modern Millie (5)
  19. Caroline, or Change (4)
  20. Billy Elliot (3)

The number in brackets is a mean score, basically telling us the average spot it held across the people who named it on their Top 10 lists. This reveals things about the tally to us, for example, LaChiusa’s The Wild Party and Billy Elliot were generally ranked higher up on people’s lists than any of the other shows in the Top 20, but their lower aggregate score means that fewer people voted for the show. This could obviously implies any number of things about any particular show, possibly about how widely known the show is or how highly regarded it is by its fans or how widely it appeals to popular tastes.

The Rest of the List (in order):

Aida, Wise Guys/Bounce/Road Show, The Full Monty, A Man of No Importance, Sweet Smell of Success, Legally Blonde, Bernarda Alba, Seussical, Jersey Boys, Xanadu, Curtains, Bare, Young Frankenstein, Next to Normal, My Life with Albertine, Little Fish, The Wedding Singer, I Love You Because, Amour, 13, Closer to Heaven, The Color Purple, Forward (?), Jane Eyre, Keating! (?), Piece (?), See What I Wanna See, Thou Shalt Not, The Pirate Queen, Little Women, High School Musical, Movin’ Out (?) and Passing Strange.

Question marks indicate shows whose presence on this list can be questioned for some reason or other. Two musicals that were definitely excluded were Enchanted, which is a film and as such did not count for the purposes of this poll and Mamma Mia!, which first appeared in the 1990s.

Thanks to all for participating. It was great fun to see everyone’s choices. So – what are the surprises in the list for everyone? With which places do you agree with or disagree?

Posted in Fun Stuff, Musicals | Tagged , | Leave a comment

More GUYS AND DOLLS Photographs

Playbill has up a second gallery of photographs from the new revival of Guys and Dolls. Here are three to enjoy; there are many more in the gallery if you follow the link provided above.

GUYS AND DOLLS 4

GUYS AND DOLLS 5

GUYS AND DOLLS 6

Go have a peek. Although the buzz surrounding the production is awful, the pictures look great.

Posted in Broadway, Musicals | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

NEWSFLASH: A New DAMN YANKEES Movie?

DAMN YANKEES

Above: Tab Hunter and Gwen Verdon in the first firm version of DAMN YANKEES

Playbill reports the following about a film remake of Damn Yankees:

The classic Richard Adler and Jerry Ross musical Damn Yankees is heading back to the silver screen…. The cast will be headed by film stars Jim Carrey as the Devil and Jake Gyllenhaal as Joe Boyd. The role of Lola has yet to be cast. The film will attempt to inject a contemporary feel into the 1950s musical, according to the trade paper.

The film would be produced by Craig Zadan and Neil Meron, who are the team behind the film adaptations of Chicago and Hairspray. The first movie that was based on the musical was by no means a classic, so a remake of Damn Yankees is a welcome idea. Let’s hope it comes to fruition.

Posted in Newsflash | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

GUYS AND DOLLS Production Photos

Playbill has up a gallery of photographs from the new Broadway revival of Guys and Dolls. Here are just a few to whet your appetite; enjoy for the complete gallery by following the link above.

GUYS AND DOLLS 1

GUYS AND DOLLS 2

GUYS AND DOLLS 3

Enjoy!

Posted in Broadway, Musicals | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Backstage at HAIR…

Here’s a video that’s loads of fun: Gavin Creel and Will Swenson backstage at Hair! It may not be new, but it’s still great!

Posted in Broadway, Musicals | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

POLL: Top Ten Musicals 2000-2009

I thought it might be fun to do decade-by-decade musical theatre “Top 10” lists and then put everyone’s lists through a points system and see what comes out tops. It’s a bit geeky, I guess, but it seems like it might be fun. We could do each decade over a certain period of time and then move on to the next.

Let’s begin with the decade which draws to a close this year.

Here is what you have to do:

  1. List your top ten musicals since 2000. You can use whatever criteria you wish to pick your top ten – your favourites, what you consider to be the best and so on. I don’t think we want to get tied up by semantics at this point. This is meant to be fun!
  2. Order your list from 1 to 10: 1 = your top musical of the decade and 10 = your 10th favourite/best musical of the decade. Your top musical will receive 10 points and your 10th favourite/best musical will receive 1 point. If you post an unranked list, your choices will all receive the same number of points in the final tally.
  3. You can be as diverse or exclusive in your choices as you wish to be – as long as you remain within the scope of stage musicals. See the list below for further guidelines in this regard.
  4. Feel free to discuss your choices if you like!
  5. I’ll close off the votes when replies slow down and then complete the tally, after which I’ll post the results in a new blog entry.

What counts and what doesn’t:

  • Original stage musicals are valid. This does not include the entire spectrum of theatre with music and the following are excluded: revivals, even ones that are revisals; revues, even if the Tony Awards considered them for musical awards; opera that the Tony Awards considered for musical awards; ballet that the Tony Awards considered for musical awards; modern dance shows that claim to be musicals; concerts; song cycles; special theatrical events; cabaret; and performance art.
  • Film musicals don’t count for this poll, but stage adaptations of film musicals that appeared on stage for the first time in this decade do.
  • Jukebox musicals that have a narrative thrust – thus separating them from revues – count for the poll.
  • If anything else comes up, I’ll handle it on a case by case basis.

Some suggestions for those who might find it useful:

Avenue Q, The Light in the Piazza, Urinetown, The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee, Grey Gardens, In the Heights, The Last Five Years, Wicked, Hairspray, The Drowsy Chaperone, The Wild Party (both versions –  and if you do list this show, please specify LaChiusa or Lippa), [title of show], Spamalot, Dirty Rotten Scoundrels, Spring Awakening, Thoroughly Modern Millie, The Producers, Caroline, or Change, Aida, Xanadu, Billy Elliot, Seussical, Legally Blonde, Young Frankenstein, Curtains, Jersey Boys, Sweet Smell of Success, The Wedding Singer, The Full Monty, The Color Purple, Thou Shalt Not, See What I Wanna See, Little Fish, A Man of No Importance, Bernarda Alba, Closer to Heaven, The Pirate Queen, Little Women, Wise Guys/Bounce/Road Show, High School Musical.

Shows that do not count for this poll:

Movin’ Out (arguably, it’s a dance show), The Frogs (it’s a “revisal”)  and Elegies (song cycle). I’m sure this list will grow…

Have fun!

Posted in Fun Stuff, Musicals | Tagged , | 38 Comments