THE SCOTTSBORO BOYS on Broadway Next Season

There may be two theatres opening up on Broadway next next week – the Circle in the Square Theater and the Henry Miller’s Theater – but Off-Broadway’s The Scottsboro Boys won’t make the transfer to the Great White Way this season because neither is an ideal production space.

Producer Barry Weissler told The New York Times that the former would require director-choreographer Susan Stroman to restage the show to suit the arena set up of the threatre and the latter is “too glamorous and sprawling” a venue for the intimate show.

The Scottsboro Boys

The only pity about this, really, is that the show might have given some artistic credibility to the fight for Best Musical, Book and Score at the Tony Awards this season, something the shows that are competing for nominations in that category this season are generally lacking. With its inventive and daring minstrel show framework, one that turns on its head the tradition of blackface, The Scottsboro Boys is one of the final collaborations between John Kander and Fred Ebb, the musical theatre team responsible for Cabaret, Chicago and many other musicals and has had a positive response in its current run at the Vineyard Theatre, having extended its closing date until 18 April. The book of the show is by David Thompson. The cast features John Cullum, Colman Domingo, Brandon Victor Dixon, Sean Bradford, Josh Breckenridge, Derrick Cobey, Rodney Hicks, KendRick Jones, Forrest McClendon, Julius Thomas III, Sharon Washington, Cody Ryan Wise and Christian White.

Let’s all hope that we do see a transfer of the show in the upcoming season. It’s about time Broadway got a new musical that’s worthy of that moniker, one that is tossed around far too easily these days.

Purchases from Amazon.com

FROM LEFT TO RIGHT:
1. Scottsboro: an American Tragedy on DVD.
2. Heaven’s Fall Film about the Scottsboro Trials on DVD.

Posted in Broadway, Commentary, Musicals, Off Broadway, Tony Awards | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ANYONE CAN WHISTLE Promo Shots

Encores! has released a set of promotional photographs by Joan Marcus featuring the cast of their upcoming production of Anyone Can Whistle.

ANYONE CAN WHISTLE at Encores! ANYONE CAN WHISTLE at Encores!

ANYONE CAN WHISTLE at Encores! ANYONE CAN WHISTLE at Encores! ANYONE CAN WHISTLE at Encores!

Donna Murphy, Sutton Foster and Raúl Esparza head up the cast as Mayeress Cora Hoover Hooper, Nurse Fay Apple and J. Bowden Hapgood respectively. Featured roles will be played by Jeff Blumenkrantz (Treasurer Cooley), John Ellison Conlee (Police Chief Magruder) and Edward Hibbert (Comptroller Schub). The ensemble includes: Clyde Alves, Tanya Birl, Holly Ann Butler, J. Austin Eyer, Sara Ford, Lisa Gajda, Stephanie Gibson, Linda Griffin, Karen Hyland, Natalie King, Grasan Kingsberry, Max Kumangai, Michael Marcotte, Joseph Medeiros, Denny Paschall, Monica L. Patton, Steve Schepis, Eric Sciotto, Tally Sessions, Brian Shepard, Dana Steingold, Brandon Tyler, Anthony Wayne and Patrick Wetzel.

Anyone Can Whistle will run for five performances from April 8 – 11 under the guidance of director-choreographer Casey Nicholaw.

Purchases from Amazon.com

FROM LEFT TO RIGHT:
1. Anyone Can Whistle 1964 Original Broadway Cast CD.
2. Anyone Can Whistle 1995 Live at Carnegie Hall CD.
3. Anyone Can Whistle Vocal Score.

Posted in Musicals, Photo Calls | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

MILLION DOLLAR QUARTET Photographs

Here’s a look at Broadway’s newest jukebox musical, Million Dollar Quartet:

Million Dollar Quartet Million Dollar Quartet Million Dollar Quartet

Million Dollar Quartet Million Dollar Quartet Million Dollar Quartet

The cast of the show features Eddie Clendening (Elvis Presley), Lance Guest (Johnny Cash), Levi Kreis (Jerry Lee Lewis), Rob Lyons (Carl Perkins), Hunter Foster (Sam Phillips) and Elizabeth Stanley (Dyanne).

Posted in Broadway, Musicals, Photo Calls | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ben Elton and THE BEAUTIFUL GAME: 10 Years Later

This year will mark the 10th anniversary of the opening of The Beautiful Game. The show, now revised as The Boys in the Photograph, will be produced in South Africa as a part of the World Cup festivities there, and perhaps it is time to consider how this show away from whatever hype surrounded its original production.

When the show first premiered, I wrote an in depth track-by-track review of the cast recording, focusing on the music and lyrics, concluding that Andrew Lloyd Webber had composed an interesting and intriguing score that was compromised to a certain extent by Ben Elton’s craftsmanship as a lyricist,

That aspect of Elton’s work hasn’t changed and it has harmed the reputation of the show. However, if one works through all of the lyrics in the show, Elton does some good work in places and I think one should remember that a set of lyrics that is half bad is also one that is half good. Consequently, his work on the show when assessed as a body of work as opposed to his work on one song, such as this, is brought down to the level of mediocrity rather than being one that displays no merit whatsoever.

Furthermore, although his work in terms of rhyme is one of the major problems of his lyrics, it is worth remembering that there is more to a lyric than perfect rhyme; indeed, there are many songs in musical theatre that rhyme perfectly but which have such poorly conceived content that no amount of perfect rhyming could save them as markers of meaning within a dramatic context. Songs that exist in the context of drama for the sole sake of wordplay are as destructive to the communication of meaning in a musical as an imperfect rhyme that jars on the ear: the best dramatic lyrics are a marriage of both elements. (This does not even take into account the problem of the contemporary ear, which is accustomed to imperfect rhyme and would probably find the former more destructive than the latter.)

With the exception of “The First Time”, every other lyric in the show has something to commend it. “The First Time” is the only song that in the score that is truly unsalvagable and would be better off being cut, though I think it is worth noting that the reasoning behind the song is solid from Elton’s perspective. It was not simply a lyric written to fill the space, as it were: Elton’s intent, as he has mentioned in interviews, was for the lyrics to contrast the lush Aspects of Love style music and to create a kind of comic clash between the two. The purpose of that is to keep the mood of the scene “up” because, as those who have seen the show or at least spent enough time to go through the show with a synopsis will know, it’s pretty serious from there on out. Ultimately, the choice doesn’t work and what Elton needs to do to counter the tragic events that follow John and Mary’s wedding is to play into the romanticism of the scene rather than try to contrive a comic “upper” for the audience. This would work particularly well given the new ending written for the show.

Elton and Lloyd Webber’s hearts certainly were in the right place when they created this show and The Beautiful Game is a noble project. It grapples with serious issues and difficult themes, particularly in the extensive book of the show which is more typical of books by Oscar Hammerstein II than those normally attached to a Lloyd Webber production. Certainly Elton’s lyrics do detract from the good intentions of the show, but I believe firmly that if Elton was meticulous about his craftsmanship in his lyric-writing in a revisiting of his work on this show, then most of the problems with the lyrics could be solved.

Of course, this does not immediately imply that the show itself is better: we begin to plant ourselves in dangerous territory when we say that a show has more merit simply because of the intentions behind it. The kudos (and the brickbats, for that matter) given to a show should be based on what is there, on the show itself. I also think that the context in which Lloyd Webber’s works takes place needs to be taken into account if we are to offer any opinions on his choice of projects: he is one of the few theatre-makers creating work for an incredibly commercial milieu. He’s not using fringe theatre with its lower costs to develop new theatre, which might allow him to be more daring, and whether he should be doing just that is a separate debate. Certainly he deserves credit when he takes a chance on a show that is more risky, but I think that allows him the space to choose when he takes on a more commercially viable project – in the way that Harold Prince did The Phantom of the Opera to make up for the losses on works that might have greater artistic integrity but which had no impact at the box office. It’s a very complicated equation, one that has artists having to support their families and their lifestyles at the bottom line. It’s even further complicated by the fact that Lloyd Webber has to create what satisfies his needs as an artist, whether you, dear reader, or I or anyone else likes it or not. I don’t think that Lloyd Webber had great stakes in The Beautiful Game and it’s a very atypical show for him: it’s clearly Elton’s baby, he who was the driving force behind the show originally and who basically only worked on the Love Never Dies to get Lloyd Webber to work on the revisions that have led to the creation of The Boys in the Photograph.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Happy Birthdays: SJS and ALW!

Many happy returns to Stephen Sondheim – the composer-lyricist of some of the world’s greatest musicals and an artist who has had a great impact on my life, both creatively and personally!

Sondheim in Studio

A happy birthday also, to Andrew Lloyd Webber – the composer behind of some of the world’s most popular musicals, someone who has provided me with some very entertaining nights in the theatre.

Andrew Lloyd Webber

Posted in General News | Tagged , | Leave a comment

New HAIR Revival Photos

Here’s a glimpse of how the new cast of the Broadway revival of Hair looks on stage.

HAIR Revival Cast HAIR Revival Cast HAIR Revival Cast

HAIR Revival Cast HAIR Revival Cast HAIR Revival Cast

The new cast, who started performing in the show on 9 March, includes Annaleigh Ashford (Jeanie), Jeannette Bayardelle (Dionne), Diana DeGarmo (Sheila), Vanessa Ray (Crissy), Kyle Riabko (Claude), Wallace Smith (Hud), Jason Wooten (Woof) and Ace Young (Berger). Rachel Bay Jones plays Mom and Josh Lamon doubles as Dad and Margaret Mead. The Tribe is completed by Justin Badger, Nicholas Belton, Larkin Bogan, Natalie Bradshaw, Catherine Brookman, Briana Carlson-Goodman, Antwayn Hopper, Jay Armstrong Johnson, Mykal Kilgore, Nicole Lewis, Anastacia McClesky, Paris Remillard, Arbender Robinson, Kate Rockwell, Cailan Rose, Rashidra Scott, Jen Sese, Lawrence Stallings, Terrance Thomas, Emma Zaks and Lee Zarrett.

Purchases from Amazon.com

FROM LEFT TO RIGHT:
1. Hair Revival Cast Recording.

Posted in Broadway, Musicals, Photo Calls | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AVENUE Q London: Version 1.3

AVENUE Q Original London Company

The London production of Avenue Q will re-open again today, after its second move to its third theatre, the Wyndham. Once again, it seems that ‘the sun is shining, it’s a lovely day’ for the London production, which originally opened in 2005 at the Noël Coward Theatre, before moving to the Gielgud Theatre last June.

Posted in General News, Musicals, West End | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

A Random Thought About Movie Musicals…

Lots of people complain about the way that stage musicals are adapted for the screen, often citing unfaithfulness to the source material as the reason for their woes. But…. should we be expecting or looking for the same experience when watching a stage production or a movie or the same narrative? Sometimes, perhaps, these two things do fall in line, but I don’t see why they should have to. They aren’t, after all, the same thing at all.

“But they’re adapting a stage show,” you might say. “Shouldn’t the filmmakers aim to preserve or imitate the effect of the show on film?”

Of course it’s an adaptation: a movie version of a stage show is by definition is an adaptation, a translation. It’s not the show itself, but then again, it never can be. Certainly the essence of what makes any show work should be preserved, but is that where it should end dramatically or intellectually?

I don’t think so. Anyone else have any thoughts? Head on to the comment box…

Posted in Commentary, Movies, Musicals | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

BLAZING SADDLES! Another Mel Brooks Musical!

A Scene from Blazing SaddlesThe hard part was inventing the candy-gram. The easy part, it seems, is for Mel Brooks to turn his films into stage musicals. Following The Producers and Young Frankenstein, Brooks is working on his third Broadway musical, this time based on his 1974 film, Blazing Saddles.

Blazing Saddles was a spoof of classic Hollywood Westerns, telling the tale of a a corrupt political boss, State Attorney General Hedley Lamarr, who wants to drive out the folks living in Rock Ridge. His modus operandi? Appointing a black sheriff to run the town. Nominated for three Academy Awards, the film is considered by many to be one of the greatest film comedies.

Brooks, who is working on the third song for this musical, spoke to The Canadian Press. Although he had little to say about his hopes for the new musical, he did have a few things to say about Young Frankenstein, or to call it by it’s full title, The New Mel Brooks Musical Young Frankenstein:

If I did (Blazing Saddles), I wouldn’t rush to New York with it because the Times would say: ‘Oh dear, oh dear, another movie converted and transmogrified into a musical…. The Times was only lukewarm to Young Frankenstein, but you know, everybody else was hot – some of the greatest reviews I ever got…. I think if Young Frankenstein had come out first, it would’ve done spectacularly. But following The Producers, you know, that was a rough go for critical praise. But you know what counters that in less than a second? Audiences – live audiences in their response. They are so enthusiastic with such rich laughter and applause.

Brooks seems to be under the impression that Young Frankenstein was a great show! Some responses to his sentiments:

  1. Another movie “transmogrified” into a musical? I’d say that’s a fair criticism considering the sheer volume of movies being transformed into musicals these days. Actually, that’s not exactly the problem; it’s the sheer number of movies that have been “transmogrified” into mediocre musicals that is.
  2. Lukewarm reviews is maybe about as much as Young Frankenstein deserves. It is no great musical comedy and despite a couple of stellar reviews, it received more mixed and scathing reviews than positive ones.
  3. Maybe Young Frankenstein would have done better if it had come before The Producers. I doubt it, though.
  4. Sure, the show was popular with audiences – after all, it’s still running! Oh, hang on, no it isn’t. It did run for 484 performances though. That would have been a success beyond almost any expectations for a musical comedy in 1930s. Unfortunately, this isn’t the 1930s.

Oh well, I guess we’re all allowed to be subjective about our own creations, just as Brooks is about Young Frankenstein. I only hope that The New Mel Brooks Musical Blazing Saddles is a damn sight better than its predecessor.

Posted in Broadway, Commentary, Musicals | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Arthur Laurents Interview in OUT

OUT Magazine has published an interview with Arthur Laurents. Entitled “Arthur Laurents Will Not Go Quietly”, the article deals somewhat with personal life and his relationship with Tom Hatcher, but also allows him to offer his trademark frank assessments of a few musical theatre matters.

Here are just a few snippets from the three page article, which can be read at the OUT website.

On his decision to change the Spanish lyrics in the revival of West Side Story back to English:

It’s hard to be tactful…. I’ll say this: I realized that we had to put in more English for the audience.

On the forthcoming Broadway revival of La Cage aux Folles:

It’s in vogue now, this so-called darker side of everything, which I think is just muddy. And cheap. Literally, in both meanings of the word. I saw it in London. I thought the production was homophobic…. There’s a line in it about Albin, [the main attraction at the nightclub]. The boy says, “How can I introduce him to my fiancé’s parents the way he dresses?” Well, in London he wore a dress and a wig in private life. In New York, he wore a suit with piping. It was effeminate, but this was out and out camp. I didn’t see Douglas Hodge, who is a very good actor. But I saw him on YouTube, and he can’t sing. And he wore a dress like it belonged to a maiden aunt.

On Julie Taymor’s Spider-Man:

I wouldn’t go to see Spider-Man.

On the much anticipated Encores! production of Anyone Can Whistle:

They’re doing some cockamamie version of it. I’m just rehearsing how I can say, “No comment.”

On his favourite Rose from Gypsy:

Patti. I shouldn’t have said I like Patti best because they’ll get pissed off. But I do.

On possible future projects:

They want to do Gypsy in London. They only want Patti and me…. She wants to. And if I did, it would be for her. I can say I’m going to live forever. But if I do Gypsy again, it might cut that short.

On Disney’s idea for an animated West Side Story:

Disney wanted to do an animated version — with cats! They sent a DVD. The black cats and the white cats. It was pure camp. They showed the Maria cat coming down the rope of an ocean liner. She was an illegal immigrant.

On a new film version of West Side Story:

I still would like another movie – because I thought the other one was so bad. And, frankly, anti–Puerto Rican. The Sharks wore makeup and had this phony accent and DayGlo costumes. But who would direct it?

A few comments of my own:

  1. I still think the idea of using the Spanish lyrics in West Side Story has merit. But removing the surtitles was a mistake and perhaps it is a technique that would work better in a new film version, where subtitles are easier to incorporate into the mise-en-scéne.
  2. I don’t quite follow the argument about the revival of La Cage aux Folles being homophobic, but then the show has never really rocked my world and I’m not sure I care that much about it.
  3. No matter what Laurents says, Patti LuPone was no Angela Lansbury as Rose. LuPone may be the Laurents favourite, but I don’t think she’s been the best.
  4. The Disney idea for an animated West Side Story is completely bizarre.

Nonetheless, it’s an interesting interview and I’d urge others to read the entire article. Scroll up and click on the link now! And, as always, feel free to leave your own comments below.

Posted in Animation, Broadway, Commentary, Interviews, Movies, Musicals, West End | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments