The Soul of a Young Man

So I’ve been thinking about the first time I encountered RENT. It would have been midway through the year when the Tony Awards were screened on MNET – a ceremony the channel has now abandoned – on which the cast performed “Seasons of Love” and a truncated version of “La Vie Boheme”.

Now to contextualise my experience of seeing that performance on TV… I come from a not-so-little town where everything Conventional is celebrated. So being 18 years old and hearing a song that mentions “bisexuals, trisexuals, homo sapiens, carcinogens, hallucinogens, men, Pee Wee Herman” and which celebrates “days of inspiration, playing hooky, making something out of nothing” and “going against the grain” – well, it certainly sticks in your mind.

Buying cast recordings of musicals in my not-so-little hometown was also a something of a mission. Unless you were looking for The Sound of Music, Phantom of the Opera or one of the other great popular classics, it was rare to find what you were looking for. And this was way before I had access to the Internet or even knew that you could buy just about any CD you wanted from Amazon. So imagine the joy of finding the original cast recording of RENT in a small independent music store – I was ecstatic! And I rushed home to listen to a couple of hours of immensely engaging music.

So what did it mean to me? RENT told me that were was a world waiting outside of the place you grew up. A world where you had the choice to experience anything you were willing to take on. RENT made me realise that your friends can also be your family. And RENT told me that being yourself was all right. Not that any of this translated into an immediate change in my behaviour or lifestyle, but this story, to a young man, meant a chance to escape. And I do believe that if you want to experience something, if you want to achieve something, that you have to be able to visualise it first. So I guess this was the start of my visualisation.

Over the next few years, RENT would remain present in my life: I remember painting sets with the music blaring in the background, trying to figure out what it was that Maureen did during “Over the Moon” and watching friends perform extracts for various practical exams. Things would change when I graduated and moved away from home to study for an Honours degree in Drama; with my critical claws sharpened and a lot of conventional baggage discarded, the time came when I began to re-evaluate what I had once accepted without question….

Posted in Broadway, Musicals, Tony Awards | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Everything is RENT

What is it about RENT? I’ve loved it, disdained it, watched it, been moved by it, been left cold by it, left it behind, returned to it and loved it all over again. I’ve sat for hours with the CD analysing the score, read books about the show, even written papers about it during my post-graduate studies in musical theatre – all in the hope that the secret of my tumultuous relationship with RENT will be revealed.

The South African production of RENT in 2007 played received mixed reviews and to less than full houses. The production was passionate if not perfect and was marketed as a controversial musical that “changed Broadway”. This was possibly not the best way to promote the show to South African audiences and I guess the poor houses proved that point.

Looking back to that marketing strategy, I don’t know that RENT changed the face of the musical theatre industry; it did, to a certain extent, create a space for an alternative, contemporary voice in which the mainstream musical could sing. And yes – the controversy is there: in the AIDS-related themes, in the depiction of homosexual characters and relationships on stage, in the use of language, in the in-your-face style of performance that the show employs.

But those things are not what RENT is about. RENT is about “La Vie Boheme” – the bohemian life. Everything else is secondary; everything is mediated through the tinted lenses through which these characters see their existence and the credo that is at the bottom line of this lifestyle is “No Day But Today”. As a theatrical text, RENT at its strongest and most vital when it remembers this. When it gets lost in its narrative complexities or resorts to blatant emotional manipulation, the show is less successful.

But more about that later: for now, it is time to start thinking again. To start unlocking the secret of this show once again, more than a decade after I was first exposed to the material. And maybe this time, I’ll find some more conclusive answers.

Posted in Broadway, Musicals | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Gwen and Chita do CHICAGO!

Here’s a rare look at the original production of Chicago.

This first set of clips is from an out-of-town tryout, shot by Fred Ebb himself (as legend has it), so we get to see some stuff that never made it into the final version of the show!

This second clip features Gwen Verdon and Chita Rivera doing “Nowadays/Hot Honey Rag” on The Howard Cossell Show, also in 1975.

This is a real treat to see… but can you imagine what we’d have on record today if YouTube had existed in 1975?!!

Posted in Broadway, Musicals | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The BEST Sondheim Diva

This man has created great work for some great divas and others have performed his work to great acclaim: Ethel Merman, Chita Rivera, Donna Murphy, Joanna Gleason, Elaine Stritch, Bernadette Peters, Maria Friedman and Judi Dench are just a few.

But is there anyone that beats Angela Lansbury, for her hat trick of Anyone Can Whistle, Gypsy and Sweeney Todd? She’s just one of the best there is. Take a look:

Everything’s coming up roses, indeed.

Posted in Broadway, Musicals | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

101 DALMATIANS II

101 Dalmatians II is one of the better Disney DTV sequels. While it’s not in the same league as the original, it’s also nowhere near as abysmal as some of the sequels have been. The team behind this film at least tries to match the tone set by the original and that’s mainly why the film works – even when the narrative isn’t quite as focused as it could be.

But the highlight for me is the appearance of Will Young on the soundtrack as he sings “Try Again”, underscoring a montage of failed attempts on the part of Thunderbolt and Lucky to get the attention of the British press with their “heroic” events. Here’s the video, courtesy of YouTube:

While I was looking for the music video, I also managed to find a video of Will Young offering some words of wisdom on the message of the song.

Very Disney, indeed!

Posted in Animation, Disney, Movies | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Original London SWEENEY

It is amazing what you can find on YouTube. It never ceases to amaze me. Today: two clips from the short-lived original London production of the Stephen Sondheim musical Sweeney Todd Not the greatest quality, but interesting to see….

I rather like Sheila Hancock in the clip of “A Little Priest”, but Denis Quilley just doesn’t seem to have the fire of Len Cariou or George Hearn.

Andrew Wadsworth, who starts off singing the reprise of “Johanna” in the second clip sounds stunning – and what you can hear of Mandy More’s Johanna is also beautiful. I liked Quilley much better here, although there’s something not quite right about the rhythm of his throat-slitting. But that could just be because the closeness of the camera. I think he’s super in the finale when Sweeney and Lovett rise out of the stage to single the final ballad.

Some further browsing around reveals that the London production added “The Beggar Woman’s Lullaby” (which some say give the Beggar Woman’s true identity away too soon) and cut the “Parlor Songs” (which are loads of fun – “Sweet Polly Plunket” is a delightful little song). I wonder what this iteration of the original Harold Prince production was like. It only ran 157 performances, so clearly the Brits didn’t take to it….

Still, I think Prince did a fantastic job on that first production. Seeing it as recorded on the television broadcast of the 1982 US touring company was an experience that I found completely thrilling. People often criticize that TV filming because it’s a mere shadow of the brilliant original production. I get that – but if that’s the case, oh my goodness, what a brilliant shadow it is.

Posted in Broadway, Musicals | Tagged , | Leave a comment

NINE….

I was browsing through some old bookmarks and came across the trailer for Rob Marshall’s upcoming film version of Nine, Arthur Kopit and Maury Yeston’s musical based on Frederico Fellini’s :

I really, really, really want this film to be phenomenal. I don’t just want something that’s OK or pretty good; I want something that’s absolutely fantastic. The cast looks great – Daniel Day-Lewis, Nicole Kidman, Marion Cotillard, Penélope Cruz, Sophia Loren, Judi Dench, Kate Hudson and Stacy Ferguson. And Marshall seems to have proved that he knows what he’s doing when it comes to musicals. The one thing that makes me pause is that some bits in the trailer look an awful lot like what Marshall did in Chicago and I honestly don’t know how I feel about that. At the very least I feel somewhat ambivalent about it. Is Marshall forcing Nine into a concept where, as in Chicago, the numbers are all diegetic? I guess I’ll have to wait until November (or whenever it’s released over here) and see…. Till then I’ll live in the hope that I’ll stop by my local cinema and be completely blown away by what’s up on the screen.

Posted in Movies, Musicals | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Marry Me a Little

It’s hard to believe that it has been a year since our production of the Craig Lucas and Norman René-conceived Stephen Sondheim revue, Marry Me a Little, at the Intimate Theatre, in which I played the “Man” and which was directed by one of my best friends and a great colleague, Jacqui Kowen. Thinking back to that wonderful experience, I wish it could have been more extended. The great thing about Sondheim’s material is that you never seem to stop discovering new layers within the pieces as you go along and I found that this accelerated tremendously as the run continued. Even today, I’m still finding answers for things that perhaps didn’t work perfectly.

I really enjoyed performing the show, which nonetheless has some problems in the way that it’s structured: “Uptown Downtown” just seems squeezed in for the sake of it (although I think I might have thought of a way integrate better than we did) and there is a huge psychological jump from “A Moment With You” to “Happily Ever After” which, linked only by “Marry Me a Little” seems a little fast. On the plus side, the divisions between fantasy and reality are pretty clear and the more you can play with those lines, the more interesting the show becomes.

The audiences, for the most part, seemed to appreciate the show and there wasn’t a single performance where someone didn’t come up to us after the show with a a story about how he/she really identified with a particular song or lyric because of a particular experience in his/her life. For me, the fact that we were actually communicating something to people that made them reflect about their lives was something that I found profoundly moving.

There is actually an incredible amount of stage business notated in the ‘book’ – such as it is – that does very little but distract the audience from the soul-stirring words. Much of this extra business was cut in our production. While still working within the concept, we tried to find a greater level of focus that came from playing the material instead of playing with pencils that fell from the desk and flushing toilets and spending forever preparing food that there wasn’t really time to eat anyway. Ultimately this served the material far better and helped the audience to follow the journey of the characters through this one evening in their lives far more clearly.

Because there is a character arc in the material, this is something that became really important to us as a point in putting this show together creatively. How do you get an audience that lives in a primarily visual culture to respond to something that is essentially an auditory experience where not only music but also words are really important? Particularly when the culture of the audience does not necessarily include Sondheim’s work as a reference point, which might prepare them for this experience. I really think this is a huge problem with audiences unaccustomed to listening to what lyrics have to say, which is particularly necessary with Sondheim’s work.

In a sense this is why “Two Fairy Tales” works so well as an opening number – besides focusing the concept for the evening, it really makes the audience realise that they have to listen because they are faced with a number that they can understand without hearing every word but in which it becomes apparent that the more words they hear, the richer their experienced will become. And so it means that their is a greater degree of attention through the much simpler “Saturday Night” and that they are settled in for for the real playing with words that happens from “Can That Boy Foxtrot?” through much of the rest of the show.

One of the things that was said to us again and again during the run was that it took a couple of numbers for audiences to tune into the idea of listening to the lyrics and the people who came twice only really managed to fully appreciate “Two Fairy Tales,” which opens the show, the second time they came to watch because they knew they had to listen from the very beginning. And there was certainly a deeper sense of appreciation for the lyrics in people who saw the show a second time.

As a side note, I must say that I cannot believe how badly the original cast recording represents the show, with the song order rearranged and the poor performances. It’s even more disappointing once you’ve seen the show in action, so to speak, than when you first hear the recording and you’re just trying to make sense of it.

Posted in Cast Recording Reviews, Musicals, Performances | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Casting for PICNIC AT HANGING ROCK

Casting has been announced for Daniel Zaitchik‘s musical adaptation of Picnic at Hanging Rock that will take place at the Eugene O’Neill Theater Center later this month. Whitney Bashor, Charlie Brady, Matt Doyle, Jessica Grove, Veronica Kuehn, Hannah Laird, Anne Letscher, Anne Nathan, Lauren Nolan, Laila Robins, Sarah Shahinian, Nick Sullivan, Kate Wetherhead, Jessica-Snow Wilson, Lauren Worsham and Valerie Wright will appear in the production, which will be directed by Joe Calarco.

Posted in Musicals, Readings, Regional | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Best CAROUSEL Recording

The 1945 Original Broadway Cast Recording of CAROUSEL

The 1945 Original Broadway Cast Recording of CAROUSEL

Where to begin? Richard Rodgers and Oscar Hammerstein II’s Carousel, which first premiered in 1945, has been recorded several times over: both the original Broadway and London cast performances were preserved, and since then we’ve had numerous revival and studio cast recordings. But perhaps it’s prudent to go back to the beginning… and then spend some time looking at a few of the major recordings of the score.

The 1945 Original Broadway Cast Recording is something special, preserving the original cast performances and providing enough of the score so that one gets a relatively good idea of the show. Yes, some songs are shortened (like “If I Loved You”), but the only song that gets left out completely is “Geraniums in the Winder”. The other cut material comprises mostly reprises and dance music. The principal cast members are all good singers. John Raitt’s baritone rounds out the songs nicely, Jan Clayton gives a moving reading of Julie’s songs, and Murvyn Vye is fun as Jigger. We did get a reminder of the original Julie and Billy’s performances on a TV special in 1954. Watching that performance reveals how masterful Rodgers and Hammerstein’s work on the show was and also gives us some idea of how fantastic Raitt and Clayton must have been when the show premiered 9 years earlier.

Looking at the same scene as it appears in the disappointing 1956 film – well, it just doesn’t compare. Neither does the 1956 Soundtrack, although it does give one a better impression of the film than it deserves. Overall, it’s too polished: the sound of the bigger orchestrations sound more generic, more Hollywood than the New England setting of the material. Gordon Macrae and Shirley Jones, while delivering highly listenable covers of the songs, are a bit too light in the central roles. There’s also not enough contrast in vocal colour between them and the other leads. Logically enough, this makes Barbara Ruick and Robert Rounseville stand out to a greater extent – and of course, this means that the balance in the cast is somewhat off-kilter. Regarding its completeness, there is more material here than on the OBCR: the ballet music is included but “Geraniums in the Winder” and “The Highest Judge of All”, which were cut from the film, are not.

Another recording that often gets mentioned in discussions about the show is the 1987 Studio Cast Recording. Some folks love it, but it’s not really one of my favourites. Although it’s almost complete, cutting only the Act 2 ballet music, there’s a bit too much tiptoeing around the roles on the part of the singers for everything to settle completely. Samuel Ramey’s singing of Billy is impressive, but he doesn’t get the character to move through the material in his interpretation of the pieces. To a lesser extent, the same is true of Barbara Cook, whose work I genuinely adore elsewhere. I suppose my major beef with this album is that it is a typical studio recording, albeit an excellent one and far more successful than most, but it never really catches alight in the way Carousel should.

The 1996 Broadway Revival Cast Recording of Carousel

The 1996 Broadway Revival Cast Recording of Carousel

My personal favourite recording of Carousel is the 1994 Broadway Revival Recording. What is really fantastic about this recording is that there is such a fantastic balance between acting and singing. While the principals have enough voice to serve the material, they also communicate the stakes of what’s going on dramatically in the score and in the show as a whole. The “Carousel Waltz” is played so beautifully on this recording – it’s heartbreaking. Michael Hayden’s idiosyncrasies as both an actor and a vocalist force you to engage with Billy and the journey of his character. Sally Murphy sings to your heart and completely gets the arc of the character from “If I Loved You” through “What’s the Use of Wond’rin'” all the way to the end of the show. One of the highlights of the recording is Audra MacDonald’s Carrie, an interpretation that really reveals her versatility as both an actress and a vocalist. She is perfectly matched by Eddie Korbich, and their rendition of “When the Children are Asleep” is unmatched. (I’d definitely pick this one over its counterpart, the 1993 Royal National Theatre Cast Recording, although I really enjoyed Joanna Riding’s Julie on that disc.)

As I’ve noted above, there are many other recordings of the show, some of which are not yet available on CD. Nonetheless, I think these recordings represent the main players of a musical that provides a truly emotional experience not only when seen live in the theatre, but also when appreciated musically on your CD player or iPod in your own time.

Posted in Cast Recording Reviews | Tagged , , | 4 Comments