Musical Theatre Sunday School: THE BOY FRIEND Readathon Part 1

To purchase the libretto of THE BOY FRIEND by Sandy Wilson, click on the image above.

Sundays at Musical Cyberspace are a time to have a look at musicals in more depth. This month, we are going to have a readathon of the libretto of The Boy Friend by Sandy Wilson. If you can get a copy, or have a copy, or have read the libretto before, it would be great to hear your comments each week. The edition that I am using was published by Andre Deutsch in 1955. This week’s discussion will focus on the Preface and Author’s Note.

The first thing that strikes me about the book are the delightful illustrations, which were done by Sandy Wilson. This section of the book includes a brilliant on of a “boy friend” on the inside cover, with three girls going crazy for him on the opposite page, as well as an illustration of the setup line for the title song – ‘Oh, do tell us about him, Polly!’ They truly capture the spirit of the piece, which is outlined succinctly by producer Vida Hope in her preface:

Over coffee I declared my love for The Boy Friend, told Sandy I wanted to do it as a serious reproduction of a period and not a burlesque, and from that moment on his whole demeanour brightened and a friendship was forged that has withstood all the vicissitudes of the various productions of the show.

My first exposure to The Boy Friend was through the film version, which I watched again and again and again as a child until my father basically ordered me to tape something else over it from the television. It seemed to irritate him no end, but I loved it. Of course, the film is something of a burlesque of the play and I wonder to what extent that most times I’ve seen a bit of The Boy Friend on stage – I’ve never made it through a full production – the film is responsible for the sense of overexaggerated parody that seems to have characterised the productions I’ve attended. It seems to me, therefore, that in this little paragraph, Hope offers some important advice to directors hoping to stage The Boy Friend: it’s not The Drowsy Chaperone. There’s a difference between a spoof and a valentine.

Another thing I found interesting in the preface was Hope’s discussion of ‘miracle’ shows, shows that are unexpected successes and which capture the public’s hearts and imagination in a way that could not have been predicted. With The Boy Friend itself being such a show, Hope also cites Journey’s End and Oklahoma! as two other examples from her recent memory. While Hope seems to be happy not to delve too deeply into what makes a ‘miracle’ show, it occurred to me how much more obsessed people are with trying to find that formula, rather than fulfilling an artistic vision or telling a story well. Certain musical theatre coomposers, lyricists and librettists – as well as producers and other parties too – seem to be more obsessed with crafting hits than with crafting a brilliant musical that connects with its audience because of its thematic concerns and the way its told. That’s why the market is oversaturated with jukebox musicals and hurried stage adaptations of movies. Neither of these is new to the musical theatre scene by any means, but their prominence today is unprecedented and there are far too many Catch Me If You Cans and We Will Rock Yous and far too few Dogfights and – dare I say it? – Mamma Mias.

In Wilson’s Author’s Note, the thing that stood out most of all for me was his citing of Noël Coward’s advice to readers of lyrics, something which Stephen Sondheim picks up on too in his two volumes of lyrics, and that is that they cannot be read in complete isolation without any sense of the music that accompanies them. Great advice, and I urge us all to remember that in this readathon.

I also adore Wilson’s conviction that his show was not a British reply to Oklahoma! and his acknowledgement that ‘English Theatre has very far to go before it can rival Broadway’ when it came to musical theatre of the 1950s. The British really came into their own with the advent of Andrew Lloyd Webber and the mega-musical, which led to what some musical theatre fanatics call “the British invasion’ and, later on, by mounting newly-focused revivals of American classics, some of which have been enlightening (Carousel, Oklahoma! and La Cage aux Folles) and others rather more ponderous (Follies, A Little Night Music).

So with all of the these thoughts in my mind, I am ready to immerse myself in the world of The Boy Friend. Next week, we’ll be looking at Act One and I hope you’ll join me. Any thoughts to add about the Preface and Authour’s Note? Head on to the comment box below.

Posted in Musical Theatre Sunday School | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

1 to 5 Musical Theatre Month: Keep it Gay!

The link for today’s five musicals is gay characters. Ten years ago, I wrote an award-winning dissertation called Homosexual Representation in the Broadway Musical: the development of homosexual identities and relationships from Patience to RENT. I’d love to go back and re-investigate that topic, but for today let’s just have a look at: Billy Elliot, The Book of Mormon, La Cage aux Folles, Hair and [title of show].

1. Hair

To purchase the new Broadway cast recording of HAIR, click on the image above.

There is so much LGBT stuff in Hair. There’s the guy in drag who sings “My Conviction”. While Jeannie is hung up on Claude, Claude on Shiela and Sheila on Berger, Berger is hung up everywhere and both Claude and Woof are hung up on Berger. Woof also states his desire to ‘make great love’ with Mick Jagger, also celebrating his appreciation of diverse sexual practices in the musical number “Sodomy”. People debate whether Hair is still relevant. The recent revival proved that it is. The show’s anti-war commentary still holds water, although I’m not a fan of productions that overtly force the link to some contemporary war and believe that audiences are intelligent to make the links for themselves.

2. The Book of Mormon

To purchase the Original Broadway Cast Recording of THE BOOK OF MORMON, click on the image above.

Two years down the line and the score of The Book of Mormon is still cracking me up. This hit show scooped up nine Tony Awards in the 2010-2011 season, although I’d still debate whether this show represented the Best Book and Score of that season. (The book all but disintegrates into links for the songs in the second act and the lyrics feature a number of errors in craftsmanship.) The gay character featured in this show is Elder McKinley, a role originated by Rory O’Malley, and one of the songs in the score, “Turn It Off” deals overtly with (amongst other things) his closeted homosexuality. It’s a great number with fantastic staging.

3. Billy Elliot

How I wish Billy Elliot had chosen “Expressing Yourself” as the number to showcase the show rather than “Angry Dance”. “Angry Dance” may work well in the context of the show, but it struggles to stand alone outside of it. “Expressing Yourself” is, of course, the number that showcases Billy’s friend, Michael, who has no problem with the taboos around cross-dressing in their conservative community. The number is five minutes of sheer joy and for me it is always great to see entertainment that affirms life for young LGBT people, because the world can still appear too full of challenges for them. That this number does so explicitly rather than in disguise is simply fabulous.

4. La Cage aux Folles

To purchase the new Broadway cast recording of LA CAGE AUX FOLLES, click on the image above.

La Cage aux Folles has never really been one of my favourites. Despite some great numbers, the score is short and repetitive. While the original production was a key show in the portrayal of homosexuals on stage, there was always something that bothered me about it: it felt “put on”. The turning point for me came with the 2008 London revival that subsequently moved to Broadway in 2010. Suddenly, the show made sense to me: a great example of how a production of a show can make the material snap into focus or not. Arthur Laurents would disagree with me – in fact he was quite vocal about how he believed this particular revival to be homophobic. But let’s just take that from whence it comes.

5. [title of show]

To purchase the Original Cast Recording of title of show, click on the image above.

[title of show] is a little show that I enjoy a lot. It’s meta-theatrical to its very core, a show about the making of a musical where the characters were played by the actors upon whom they were based, prompting questions at the time of the show’s initial run as to whether the show could be played successfully by anyone other than the original cast. Of course, it can be and, in fact, it is a show I would enjoy doing at some point. Now that I think about it, the show preempts Smash in its sharing of the backstage process, although Smash takes a few liberties more often than it should. Of course, the backstage musical is no new thing, but [title of show] took the idea to a new place. It’s a little show that could.

Every day this December, I’m choosing 5 musicals linked by a common theme and ranking them from best to worst. I’d love to see your rankings of the musicals posted each day, so head on down to the comment box and share your thoughts.

Posted in Fun Stuff | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

1 to 5 Musical Theatre Month: Bernadette Peters

The link for today’s five musicals is Bernadette Peters. It goes without saying that Peters has had an incredible career on Broadway and choosing only a handful of her shows to feature here today was a tough choice. I’ve decided to go with some of her most recent appearances in musicals on Broadway, namely: Follies, A Little Night Music, Gypsy, Annie Get Your Gun and The Goodbye Girl.

1. Gypsy

Picking the show to take top honours here is difficult given that three of my favourite shows of all time appear here. Gypsy has the edge though. There’s not an ounce of fat in the score. The book is hands down one of the best Broadway has ever seen. (Well written books are all but a lost art on Broadway these days.) The integration between the two is seamless. Peters courted some controversy when she appeared in Gypsy in 2003. People either loved her or hated her in the role, and many of the naysayers debated whether or not she was miscast. While I do give the cast recording a spin from time to time, Peters isn’t my favourite Rose. Angela Lansbury is still the measuring stick.

2. Follies

Follies is a phenomenal piece of work, one that been subjected to all kinds of butchering since its original production. The most extreme of these revisions was seen in the London version of the show, but those changes were perhaps more obvious than the numerous tweaks made to the book for the Broadway revival that followed it. Peters appeared in the second Broadway revival of the show, as Sally, in the 2011-2012 season and, as with Gypsy, audiences were split about how successful her interpretation of the role was, as evidenced in the seemingly unending forum topics that were posted on sites like BroadwayWorld and All That Chat.

3. A Little Night Music

How I wish that Peters had been paired with Lansbury in the original cast of the revival of this marvellous show on Broadway. Catherine Zeta-Jones had star power and was cast for the selling power she had, but Peters and Lansbury would have been a perfect combination. (I also hated all of the stories about Elaine Stritch, opposite whom Peters was cast, going up on her words regularly. Legend or not, I don’t have sympathy for such a lack of basic professionalism.) The show itself is by turns lush and romantic and witty. It is a pity that wasn’t captured in the film adaptation. It’s a pity that with all the movie musicals going into production that a new version of A Little Night Music isn’t on the cards. It’s a well known fact that Lansbury is looking around for a great film vehicle. This could be it.

4. Annie Get Your Gun

Let’s start off by saying that the “revisal” of Annie Get Your Gun in which Peters found was something of a curate’s egg. Peters herself was a playful and sympathetic Annie, but listening to the recording is a frustrating experience because it is a reminder of the mixed results that were the end point of the good intentions that were at the core of this revival. I don’t like the show within a show framework. Some of the cuts to the score water down some of the subtleties this show can communicate about its setting and how we read its dynamics so many years later. Some of the new orchestrations are fantastic, while others stall at the gate. I guess there’s no point in getting too worked up. It was but a moment in time.

5. The Goodbye Girl

Everyone has shows that they just can’t get into. For me, The Goodbye Girl is one of those shows, the most recent Broadway musical in which Peters originated a role. The best thing I can say about the show is that it’s one of those musicals from the 1990s that tried really hard without getting anywhere at all. Whatever magical spark that brings the best musicals to life and even elevates some mediocre ones to popularity was just missing from this one. Ah well…

Every day this December, I’m choosing 5 musicals linked by a common theme and ranking them from best to worst. I’d love to see your rankings of the musicals posted each day, so head on down to the comment box and share your thoughts.

Posted in Fun Stuff | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

1 to 5 Musical Theatre Month

Every day this December, I’m choosing 5 musicals linked by a common theme and ranking them from best to worst. I’d love to see your rankings of the musicals posted each day, so head on down to the comment box each day and share your thoughts.

Enjoy!

Posted in Fun Stuff | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Look who’s here! I’m still here!

Things on Musical Cyberspace have been rather quiet of late. It has been a busy couple of months for me, what with trying to balance teaching, writing reviews for BroadwayWorld and working on 8 books that will hopefully be published in 2013. But I have a month or so off in which to find myself again and hopefully things will get back on track here. Looking forward to spending the summer indulging in my favourite things: musicals!

Posted in General News | Tagged | Leave a comment

Monday Meditation: I’m Over People Who Repeat Themselves (and Never Take the Time to Back Up What They’re Saying)

Artwork for the original production of FOLLIES

Artwork for the original production of FOLLIES

If you’re reading this post and you’re a fan of musical theatre, chances are that you belong to a message board or Facebook group about musical theatre. And you’ll know that in that group there is somebody whose threads are so predictable that you might as well not even open them up.

For instance, if somebody posts a topic about Stephen Sondheim on the BroadwayWorld Message Board, it’s a certainty that a certain poster known to members there as After Eight will arrive to say something about how all the audience members were tormented and bored to death by the particular Sondheim show under discussion and that the reason for this is that the show is an awful blight on the face of musical theatre. No qualification follows. That’s it. That’s all there ever is. Time and time again.

After Eight is one of many such folk that a musical theatre fan might meet on the Internet. The range of topics is wide: that Finian’s Rainbow is a satiric masterpiece and that the use of blackface in the show is completely justified; that My Fair Lady is a flawless masterpiece; that the book of Follies is flawed because it follows an a-typical narrative structure – and the list goes on. Very rarely are factors that might qualify those statements taken into account, factors like different social contexts, the craftsmanship of lyric writing and differences in genre and style.

There once was a time when posts like these used to drive me a little bit crazy. Now, I brush them aside and move on to where the good discussion is. I don’t have time to waste on people who only echo an opinion they’ve heard somewhere else or try to pass off qualitative opinions about the artistry of musicals as if musicals, like all other art forms, don’t have a foundation in technique. Get a grip, folks, and use what you (should) know to back up what you say. It makes what you say far more engaging.

This post is inspired by and a response to “I Am Over People Who Repeat Themselves (When I Didn’t Want to Hear What They Said in the First Place)” in Shirley MacLaine’s I’m Over All That and Other Confessions.

Posted in Monday Meditation | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Monday Meditation: I’ll Never Get Over (Trying to Understand) Michael John LaChiusa

Toni Collette and Yancey Arias in THE WILD PARTY. Photo credit: Joan Marcus.

Toni Collette and Yancey Arias in THE WILD PARTY. Photo credit: Joan Marcus.


Is there any theatremaker working in musical theatre today who is as divisive as Michael John LaChiusa? Some people think his work is amazing, diverse and complex while others think he writes musicals that are unmemorable, one-note and pretentious.

I’m in the former category. It’s my view that the LaChiusa’s career over the past two decades or so emulates (to some extent) reactions to the career of Stephen Sondheim during the time when Sondheim was writing really edgy and groundbreaking stuff, like Anyone Can Whistle, Company and Follies. (That’s not to say that Sondheim’s later musicals are any less noteworthy; part of this comparison involes the mileau in which Sondheim was working at the time.) Those musicals took the form seriously, pushing it forward during an age when musical theatre was having something of an idenity crisis. The so-called “golden age” was over, pop music was on the rise and the popularity of musicals was on the wane. When LaChiusa started rising to prominance with First Lady Suite and Hello Again in the 1990s, Broadway was also experiencing something of an identity crisis. The “megamusical” invasion of the 1980s had slowed down, many of the old guard had either passed on or slowed down and Disney was starting to make its presence felt on Broadway, as were the jukebox musicals and more-and-more frequent movie-to-musical adaptations that would really trend at the turn of the century. The faux musical was on the rise.

It seems appropriate to use that term here as it was a term introduced by LaChiusa himself in a controversial article written for Opera News, “The Great Grey Way”. When that article was published, people were up in arms. People like Marc Shaiman, one of the artists who came under fire in LaChiusa’s article, lashed back at LaChiusa. Message boards were abuzz with debate about whether LaChiusa’s opinions held any truth, about whether his choice to criticise his contemporaries revealed conflicting interests and whether his tone obfuscated his point. Personally, I found the article to be a refreshing eye-opener: although I didn’t agree with some of the specific examples cited by LaChiusa in his discussion, I believe his point that it was becoming more and more difficult to write musicals with serious intentions and artistic integrity and have them produced on Broadway, which hitherto had been a space for both serious and light shows, was a valuable one. I find it difficult to view the brief stay on Broadway of a show like John Kander, Fred Ebb and David Thompson’s brilliant The Scottsboro Boys and the absence on Broadway of shows like LaChiusa’s own The Highest Yellow and Giant (on which he collaborated with Sybille Pearson) without considering the points raised by LaChiusa in that article.

Digressions aside, it seems to me that many of LaChiusa’s detractors are perhaps akin to those who couldn’t see the value of Sondheim’s work for his experimentation with the form. Because the truth is that, despite their complexity, LaChiusa’s musicals are some of the greatest pieces of contemporary musical theatre around and, because of their complexity, they offer endless opportunities for engagement for someone who’s willing to go on the journey with him.

So if you’re one of those who haven’t yet discovered LaChiusa’s work or someone who’s avoided it because of what others have said about it rather than making up your own mind or even somebody who has given one of his musicals a spin and dismissed it without so much as a second thought, how about joining me today in giving one of the cast album’s of a LaChiusa show a spin? I’ll probably go for Marie Christine or The Wild Party today. I haven’t decided yet. Which one will you choose?

This post is inspired by and a response to “I’ll Never Get Over Trying to Understand the Russian Soul” in Shirley MacLaine’s I’m Over All That and Other Confessions.

Posted in Monday Meditation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

BWW Reviews: QUEEN AT THE BALLET

To purchase the Queen's GREATEST HITS, click on the image above.

Bovim Ballet’s Queen at the Ballet is back on stage in Cape Town this month. Read my review of the show at BroadwayWorld! Nope, it’s not a musical, but it features some folk who have been onstage in some of the biggest stage musicals in South Africa, including Cito (Jesus Christ Superstar, Chess), Darren Greeff (Cats, Grease, The Phantom of the Opera), Ignatius van Heerden (Jesus Christ Superstar, Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat), Magdalene Minnaar (The Phantom of the Opera) and Louisa Talbot (Show Boat).

Posted in BroadwayWorld Reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BWW Reviews: BURN THE FLOOR

To purchase the BURN THE FLOOR show FLOOR PLAY on DVD, click on the image above.

Burn the Floor is touring South Africa until September, with stops in Cape Town, Johannesburg and Durban. Although it is not a musical, the show features some fantastic dancing, which should be of interest to any true musical theatre fan. Read my review of the show at BroadwayWorld!

Posted in BroadwayWorld Reviews | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Musical Theatre Stock Characters

How many stock characters from musicals appear in THE DROWSY CHAPERONE? Purchase the Original Broadway Cast Recording by clicking on the image above and find out!

While cleaning out and backing up my hard drive today, I came across the following little list of stock characters from musicals:

  • Three happy-go-lucky sailors on shore leave. Or three soldiers on a three-day pass. Anyway there’s always three of them.
  • The wisecracking belter who doesn’t have much to do with the plot, and doesn’t interact much with the other characters, but gets lots to sing, including a big mock-gospel number in act 2.
  • The fast-talking playboy hero (who settles down with the strong-willed heroine who “tames” him).
  • The sad-faced little middle-aged guy who gets pushed around by everybody and talked into wacky schemes by said
    hero. Think William Gaxton and Victor Moore.
  • The heroine’s middle-aged chaperone, who has a comic romance with the hero’s middle-aged friend.
  • The heroine’s two (usually two) wisecracking friends, both slightly more worldly-wise than she is.

Google helped me to find out that I probably originally read that on a group called rec.arts.theatre.musicals, that it was written by somone named Jaime J. Weinman, and helped me to find a number of other suggestions from a host of folks who contributed to that group back in the day (2002):

  • The big-voiced black woman with an excess of attitude. (Mimi Paragon)
  • The ingenue to who becomes a soubrette. (Mimi Paragon)
  • The cad with a heart of gold. (Mimi Paragon)
  • The skirt who is doing him dirt. (Kaffitimi)
  • The king of an underworld ring. (KAR)
  • The fragile old lady who belts out a life-affirming ditty. (Parterrebox)
  • The Latina spitfire. (Parterrebox)
  • The tempestuous foreign-accented diva. (Parterrebox)
  • The fireplug ensemble dancer who does a gymnastic solo break. (Parterrebox)
  • The baritone lady growler second lead. (Parterrebox)
  • Every variation of foreigners cliché: the authoritarian German, the lustful Frenchman, the snotty English, the drunk Irish, etc. (Gérard Morvan)
  • The wisecracking second banana. (Bushwacker)
  • The tart with a heart. (David Thompson)
  • Juvenile lead who takes over a tough city with some small town innocent clarity. And who dances rings around highly-trained Broadway pros. (Jason Travis and Steve Newport)

An interesting list, no? Of course, it’s more applicable to a certain kinds of musical theatre than others and some are anomalies rather than true stock characters, but it was a paritularly interesting list to read not that musical theatre has become much more meta-theatrical than it was ten years ago.

Anyone have any others to add?

Posted in Fun Stuff | Tagged , | Leave a comment